- #Video codec for mac install
- #Video codec for mac pro
- #Video codec for mac trial
- #Video codec for mac free
Brian Thomas on Library format change between 10.5 and 10.6? Apple Final Cut Pro X.Mirza Kadic on timeRemap play Adobe After Effects Expressions.Steve Bentley on displacementmap instead of normal? Maxon Cinema 4D.
#Video codec for mac free
I don’t think these free decoders have been updated for the new ProRes flavors yet.Ĭomposing Duo Robl + Sutta Score ‘Grasshoppers’ You can read QT ProRes files that way, but not generate them. But it’s not really identical to the original 🙂Īpple offers free ProRes decoders for Macs without FCS, and also for Windows.
A loose term which means that on simple inspection it looks identical to the original. ProRes is “visually lossless”, not mathemtically lossless. PNG produces smaller file sizes for most “video” content. It’s great when going from one app to another, for example.Īnimation produces smaller sizes in content which has large areas of plain color (a lower third can be as low as 1 MB/s and it’s still lossless). It’s more an exchange or “digital freezer” flavor, because real time playback can be challenging. The two drawbacks are: No higher bit depths (16/32 bpc), and zero performance optimizations (just like Animation, but even worse).
Todd didn’t mean a sequence of PNG stills, but rather using PNG encoding in a Quicktime file. Putting the ‘T’ back in ‘RTFM’ : After Effects Help on the Web If you’re handing off something as an intermediate file, and you’d rather not lose the data that gets quantized out with an 8-bpc codec, then the conversation gets more interesting. Also, there’s the issue of 8-bpc versus 10-bpc versus 16-bpc versus 32-bpc formats. E.g., if you are using a codec as an interchange format within your own workflow, then universality doesn’t matter so much, and you can use whatever esoteric codec that you want. For most of what people do with After Effects, I think that PNG in a QuickTime container works well as a nearly universal lossless compression format in a nearly universal container… but Animation might do better in some cases.īTW, I recognize that this is a VERY (overly) simple answer to a very complex question. Animation does better for things with large expanses of the same color, like cartoons (hence its name), and PNG does better with more photorealistic gradients. Look forward to the opinions even if its just a quick post saying “ANIMATION” !Īnimation and PNG are both excellent choices. I am thinking that perhaps we have all gotten used to using animation or uncompressed though 😛 (maybe you know another forum here that other people might be able to chime in some suggestions or have knowledge in this field).
#Video codec for mac install
Maybe some MAC users know where I might find the install files for some of the listed codecs above?Įither way would love to hear your suggestions and personal experiences. I am open to any suggestions paid or free. I am more than used to dealing with the large file sizes of uncompressed video I just thought it might be time to look and see if I can tighten up in this area with some good use of codecs. I used to use ANIMATION Codec, but in my reading heard of PNG format in video, so I might be trying this out more often. Now so far my problem 😛 I am on a MAC, and I have been trying to find the “better” codecs for my operating system but I can not find them or they are not being developed for this operating system. The most balanced and flexible codec is FFV1: relatively good speed and high compression for various presets.” In Maximum Compression area the overall winner is YULS. ” In Video Capture and Video Editing Area the overall clear winner is Lagarith. This documents many lossless codecs some with good compression for archiving and others for just usual working but saving some filespace.Īlpary, ArithYuv, AVIzlib, CamStudio GZIP, CorePNG, FastCodec, FFV1, Huffyuv, Lagarith, LOCO, LZO, MSU Lab, PICVideo, Snow, x264, YULS
#Video codec for mac trial
Also there seemed an aggressive promotional scheme where by they will give you a free license if you promote them so my web research might be biased on this codec.I have DL’d the trial and tried it on some footage not extensively but my gut feeling is that now in 2009 there are some new codecs around that give good compression and fast decoding/encoding that are lossless, and not at a such a cost. Well a little research and looking to there site reveals that there has been no news updates since june 2007 and mixed voices on the codec. This codec was called sheer video by bitjazz. I was thinking the other day about lossless codecs, and was reminded that many years ago I remembered a codec that said it had 2:1 compression realtime encoding/decoding and was on mac and pc.
0 kommentar(er)
